1. Author

• Who is the author of the information source?
• Do you know anything about his/her credentials?
• Especially in the case of an Internet source, the author's name may not be present; what does this say about the potential validity of the source?
• Has your instructor mentioned the author in class?
• Can you find other books or articles written by the author? Use the library catalogue, periodical indexes and/or Internet search engines to find out. A book will often include a list of other books written by the same author.

2. Publisher/Institutional Affiliation

• Who is the publisher of the source or, in the case of an Internet document, on whose Web site is it published? A book published by a university press or an Internet document on a university's Web site is more likely to be a reliable source of information.
• What else has the publisher published?
• Is the publisher/Web site likely to have a particular bias? If so, you will want to take this into account, perhaps by balancing the information with a source on the same topic from another point of view. For example, take the following two

3. Date of Publication or Last Revision

• The date of publication may be an important factor in evaluating an information source, especially in subject areas - such as science and technology - where currency is significant.
• Almost all printed information sources include a date of publication, as well as dates of previous and/or revised editions, if any. In the case of books, these dates are normally located on the title page and/or the the date normally appears on the cover, as well as on pages throughout the periodical issue.
  reverse (or "verso") of the title page. In the case of periodical articles,
• Internet documents should, but do not always, include the date on which the document was last revised. This date is likely to be found either at the top of the document (the "header") or at the bottom (the "footer").

4. Documentation/References

• Just as your research paper must include a list of references, a scholarly book, article or Web page ought to contain a list of sources consulted, a bibliography, and/or footnotes. The presence of references does not necessarily imply that the information contained in the document is accurate; however, it does allow the reader to check the author's sources to independently verify the information.

5. Intended Audience

• What type of audience is the author addressing?
• Is the information aimed at specialists in the field or a general audience?
• Is the information too elementary, too technical, too advanced, or just right for your needs?

6. Purpose

• What seems to be the purpose of the author and, in the case of a Web document, the purpose of the Web site on which it appears?
• Is its sole purpose to sell a product or to promote a cause?
• Does the document contain mainly the author's own opinions about a subject or does it present facts objectively?

7. Writing Style

• Is the document organized logically?
• Are the arguments clearly presented?
• Is the text easy to read or is it overly verbose or stilted and choppy?

8. Relevance

• Perhaps most importantly, is the information relevant to your topic? Although it is often a good idea to read as broadly as possible around the area of your topic, you probably don't have time during a single OUC course to waste your time reading irrelevant sources. Sometimes, it may not be apparent until you have read a substantial portion of the document that a document is not relevant. However, you can often judge a document's relative merits simply by looking at its title, table of contents, introduction, and index, if one is present.

Back to Contents